<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AU Canada IVEY PMI 04/07/10</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.henryliuforex.com/1784/canada-ivey-pmi-040710/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.henryliuforex.com/1784/canada-ivey-pmi-040710/</link>
	<description>Forex News Trading and Forex Strategy Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:00:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Liu</title>
		<link>http://www.henryliuforex.com/1784/canada-ivey-pmi-040710/comment-page-1/#comment-1220</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Liu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 00:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.henryliuforex.com/?p=1784#comment-1220</guid>
		<description>Mike:

You have to look at the context of the market.  For one obvious reason is the psychological level at the parity, or 1.0000 on USD/CAD.  Yes, the number is positive, but for one thing it didn&#039;t really hit our tradable deviation, and if you have read my analysis, this is what I warned about &quot;With USD/CAD lingering at the parity level, if we get a significant positive release, market could make an attempt to take out 1.0000 level;&lt;strong&gt; if it is taking out decisively&lt;/strong&gt;, according to analysts featured on Bloomberg, we could see up to 0.9700 in the next few weeks.&quot;  Unfortunately, we saw about 5 to 10 pips of movement beyond 1.0000, then bounced back.  That should be your first clue that market isn&#039;t ready to break below... As a matter of fact, I called a BUY at 1.0000 in the trade after seeing it unable to break below.  

Henry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike:</p>
<p>You have to look at the context of the market.  For one obvious reason is the psychological level at the parity, or 1.0000 on USD/CAD.  Yes, the number is positive, but for one thing it didn&#8217;t really hit our tradable deviation, and if you have read my analysis, this is what I warned about &#8220;With USD/CAD lingering at the parity level, if we get a significant positive release, market could make an attempt to take out 1.0000 level;<strong> if it is taking out decisively</strong>, according to analysts featured on Bloomberg, we could see up to 0.9700 in the next few weeks.&#8221;  Unfortunately, we saw about 5 to 10 pips of movement beyond 1.0000, then bounced back.  That should be your first clue that market isn&#8217;t ready to break below&#8230; As a matter of fact, I called a BUY at 1.0000 in the trade after seeing it unable to break below.  </p>
<p>Henry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike L</title>
		<link>http://www.henryliuforex.com/1784/canada-ivey-pmi-040710/comment-page-1/#comment-1217</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 14:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.henryliuforex.com/?p=1784#comment-1217</guid>
		<description>OMG.
I got killed on this Ivey PMI number. 

It was a positive number, but the CAD fell in value (i.e. USD/CAD increased!!!).

wtf!!!??? holy moly ... i think it had something to do with crude oil inventories coming out about 30mins after.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG.<br />
I got killed on this Ivey PMI number. </p>
<p>It was a positive number, but the CAD fell in value (i.e. USD/CAD increased!!!).</p>
<p>wtf!!!??? holy moly &#8230; i think it had something to do with crude oil inventories coming out about 30mins after.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
